Legislature(2023 - 2024)GRUENBERG 120
05/08/2023 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB129 | |
| HB11 | |
| HB181 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 129 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 181 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 129-VOTER REGISTRATION
3:29:55 PM
CHAIR VANCE announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 129, "An Act relating to voter registration; and
providing for an effective date." [Before the committee was
CSHB 129(STA), as amended on 5/5/23.]
3:30:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 3 to CSHB
129(STA), labeled 33-LS0668\B.4, Klein, 5/4/23, which read:
Page 1, line 1, following "Act":
Insert "relating to the master register;"
Page 1, following line 2:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Section 1. AS 15.07.127 is amended to read:
Sec. 15.07.127. Preparation of master register.
The director shall prepare both a statewide list and a
list by precinct of the names and addresses of all
persons whose names appear on the master register and
their political party affiliation. The director shall
create a daily backup of the master register at 5:00
p.m. each day. Subject to the limitations of
AS 15.07.195, any person may obtain a copy of the
list, a daily backup of the list, or a part of the
list, or an electronic format containing both
residence and mailing addresses of voters, by applying
to the director and paying to the state treasury a fee
as determined by the director."
Page 1, line 3:
Delete "Section 1"
Insert "Sec. 2"
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
REPRESENTATIVE C. JOHNSON objected.
3:30:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN explained that Amendment 3 would
implement a daily backup of the master voter registration list
making the daily backup available to any person upon request.
REPRESENTATIVE C. JOHNSON asked the Division of Elections (DOE)
whether a daily backup at 5:00 p.m. each day was a reasonable
request.
3:31:56 PM
CAROL BEECHER, Director, Division of Elections (DOE), Office of
the Lieutenant Governor, explained that currently, DOE backed up
its database each night at 12:00 a.m. Should Amendment 3 pass,
the division would need to reconfigure the current system so as
not to impede the 5:00 p.m. backup. She indicated that the
proposal would be costly and time consuming.
REPRESENTATIVE C. JOHNSON inquired about the division's staff
load at 5:00 p.m. on any given day.
MS. BEECHER said staff didn't work beyond 5:00 p.m. on a regular
basis. She noted that the database backup process was
automated.
3:33:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER asked whether the previous day's data
was saved in its entirety in a separate file or whether there
was only one file for the entire database.
MS. BEECHER said the information was backed up every day, from
which point old data was not saved. She emphasized the size of
the database, indicating that it would expand at a rate of 2-6
gigabytes each day if daily lists were retained.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER asked whether a snapshot of the
database from any specific day could be provided.
MS. BEECHER remarked, "When it is backed up, then each time we
go from the most current backup forward." She highlighted the
distinction between the backup of the database and the voter
registration list, which was compiled by DOE staff using
information from the database.
3:36:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN shared his understanding that there were
two separate backups: one at midnight and one at 5:00 p.m. He
asked Ms. Beecher to distinguish between the two.
MS. BEECHER clarified that the database was currently backed up
at around midnight each day, not at 5:00 p.m.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN questioned the file size of the voter
registration list.
MS. BEECHER offered to follow up with the requested information.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether a backup at midnight would
conflict with the division's current processes.
MS. BEECHER said a specific time would be problematic for the
division to adhere to.
3:39:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether the division would object
to language requiring a daily backup [without a specific time].
MS. BEECHER clarified that the division already backed up its
database every day.
CHAIR de asked whether Amendment 3 would instigate fiscal note
if it required the director to create a daily backup with no
specified time.
MS. BEECHER reiterated that that the division already ran a
backup of the database every day. She highlighted the language
on line 12 of the proposed amendment, which DOE interpreted as
requiring a daily backup of the voter registration list. She
explained that the voter registration list was created by
request, as opposed to every day, adding that it took time to
respond to each request.
3:40:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether it was a fair characterization
to say that the first half of the proposed amendment was already
in practice and the second half might be prohibitively
difficult.
MS. BEECHER explained that requiring the division to retain a
daily backup of the voter registration list would require a
large amount of data, as every daily backup would need to be
stored somewhere in the database.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY suggested tracking the changes made to the
list on each particular day, rather than saving every daily
backup of the list.
MS. BEECHER reiterated that it would be costly to make and
retain a list every day and a lot of work to track the changes.
She stressed that the list was a living document, meaning that
each day, staff added and removed people from the voter
registration list.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY pointed out that in the healthcare industry,
any changes or additions made to an electronic medical record
were timestamped. He suggested upgrading the technology to
simple software that was not time-consuming or expensive.
3:44:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN offered closing remarks on Amendment 3.
He characterized the division's choice to "destroy and override"
the list as an "obvious violation [the] public record retention
laws." He opined that there was no justification for deleting
the record.
[The committee considered the objection to Amendment 3 to be
maintained.]
3:45:51 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Eastman voted in
favor of Amendment 3. Representatives Carpenter, C. Johnson,
Grey, Groh, Allard, and Vance voted against it. Therefore,
Amendment 3 failed by a vote of 1-6.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 4 to CSHB
129(STA), labeled 33-LS0668\B.5, Klein, 5/4/23, which read:
Page 1, line 1, following "registration;":
Insert "relating to voter identification;"
Page 1, following line 2:
Insert new bill sections to read:
"* Section 1. AS 15.07.060 is amended by adding a
new subsection to read:
(g) In addition to the information required
under (a) of this section, an applicant may elect to
provide the diviion a unique security identifier
selected by the applicant. Upon an applicant's
request, the division shall, for all elections
purposes, require and accept a unique identifier
selected by the applicant instead of the identifiers
provided under (a)(2) and (3) of this section.
* Sec. 2. AS 15.07.125 is amended by adding a new
subsection to read:
(b) The official registration list for an
election and the list of persons eligible to vote in
each precinct must include the unique security
identifier for each person on the list who has
provided a unique security identifier under
AS 15.07.060(g)."
Page 1, line 3:
Delete "Section 1"
Insert "Sec. 3"
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 4, following line 15:
Insert new bill sections to read:
"* Sec. 8. AS 15.20.030 is amended to read:
Sec. 15.20.030. Preparation of ballots,
envelopes, and other material. The director shall
provide ballots for use as absentee ballots in all
districts. The director shall provide a secrecy sleeve
in which the voter shall initially place the marked
ballot, and shall provide an envelope with the
prescribed voter's certificate on it, in which the
secrecy sleeve with ballot enclosed shall be placed.
The director shall prescribe the form of and prepare
the voter's certificate, envelopes, and other material
used in absentee voting. The voter's certificate shall
include a declaration, for use when required, that the
voter is a qualified voter in all respects, a blank
for the voter's signature and a blank for a unique
security identifier selected under AS 15.07.060(g), a
certification that the affiant properly executed the
marking of the ballot and gave the voter's identity,
blanks for the attesting official or witness, and a
place for recording the date the envelope was sealed
and witnessed. The envelope with the voter's
certificate must include a notice that false
statements made by the voter or by the attesting
official or witness on the certificate are punishable
by law.
* Sec. 9. AS 15.20.203(b) is amended to read:
(b) An absentee ballot may not be counted if
(1) the voter has failed to properly
execute the certificate;
(2) an official or the witnesses authorized
by law to attest the voter's certificate fail to
execute the certificate, except that an absentee
ballot cast in person and accepted by an absentee
voting official or election supervisor may be counted
despite failure of the absentee voting official or
election supervisor to properly sign and date the
voter's certificate as attesting official as required
under AS 15.20.061(c);
(3) the ballot is not attested on or before
the date of the election;
(4) the ballot, if postmarked, is not
postmarked on or before the date of the election;
(5) after the day of election, the ballot
was delivered by a means other than mail; [OR]
(6) the voter voted
(A) in person and is a
(i) first-time voter who initially
registered by mail or by facsimile or other electronic
transmission approved by the director under
AS 15.07.050, has not provided the identification
required by AS 15.15.225(a), was not eligible for
waiver of the identification requirement under
AS 15.15.225(b), and has not provided the identifiers
required in AS 15.07.060(a)(2) and (3) that can be
verified through state agency records described in
AS 15.07.055(e); or
(ii) voter other than one described in (i)
of this subparagraph, did not provide identification
described in AS 15.15.225(a), was not personally known
by the election official, and has not provided the
identifiers required in AS 15.07.060(a)(2) and (3); or
(B) by mail or electronic transmission, is
a first-time voter who initially registered by mail or
by facsimile or other electronic transmission approved
by the director under AS 15.07.050 to vote, has not
met the identification requirements set out in
AS 15.07.060, and does not submit with the ballot a
copy of a
(i) driver's license, state identification
card, current and valid photo identification, birth
certificate, passport, or hunting or fishing license;
or
(ii) current utility bill, bank statement,
paycheck, government check, or other government
document; an item described in this sub-subparagraph
must show the name and current address of the voter;
or
(7) the voter elected to use a unique
security identifier selected under AS 15.07.060(g) and
the voter failed to provide the unique security
identifier.
* Sec. 10. AS 15.20.207(b) is amended to read:
(b) A questioned ballot may not be counted if
the voter
(1) has failed to properly execute the
certificate;
(2) is a first-time voter who initially
registered by mail or by facsimile or other electronic
transmission approved by the director under
AS 15.07.050, has not provided the identification
required by AS 15.15.225(a), was not eligible for
waiver of the identification requirement under
AS 15.15.225(b), and has not provided the identifiers
required in AS 15.07.060(a)(2) and (3) that can be
verified through state agency records described in
AS 15.07.055(e); [OR]
(3) is a voter other than one described in
(2) of this subsection, did not provide identification
described in AS 15.15.225(a), was not personally known
by the election official, and has not provided the
identifiers required in AS 15.07.060(a)(2) and (3); or
(4) elected to use a unique security
identifier selected under AS 15.07.060(g) and the
voter failed to provide the unique security
identifier."
Renumber the following bill section accordingly.
REPRESENTATIVE C. JOHNSON objected.
3:46:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN explained that Amendment 4 would allow
applicants to select a unique security identifier to verify
their identity in place of their Social Security number, which
he characterized as a poor way of verifying someone's
information after a data breach.
3:48:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked for DOE's perspective on the proposed
amendment.
MS. BEECHER sought clarity on paragraph (7) of Amendment 4 and
asked what the security identifier would look like, whether it
be numbers or letters or a combination of both.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether the proposed amendment would
require a fiscal note.
MS. BEECHER answered yes, there would be costs associated with
assigning a new unique security identifier. Further, the
division would need to figure out a way to apply the identifier
to various documents and the voter registration list.
CHAIR VANCE said she was supportive of added security; however,
her intention was to keep the bill focused on the voter rolls
with no fiscal note in light of [the state's] current finances.
3:51:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN opined that the state's actions caused
voter information to be compromised; consequently, he believed
the state had a responsibility to safeguard that information.
In reference to paragraph (7), he suggested that any person who
forgot the unique identifier could verify his/her identity at a
DOE office with a driver's license, state identification, or
voter card and create a new security identifier of his/her own
choosing.
3:52:14 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representative Eastman voted in
favor of Amendment 4. Representatives Allard, Carpenter, C.
Johnson, Gray, Groh, and Vance voted against it. Therefore,
Amendment 4 failed by a vote of 1-6.
3:52:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 5 to CSHB
129(STA), labeled 33-LS0668\B.3, Klein, 5/4/23, which read:
Page 1, line 1, following "registration;":
Insert "relating to voting by mail;"
Page 4, following line 15:
Insert new bill sections to read:
"* Sec. 6. AS 15.20.081(c) is amended to read:
(c) Except as provided in (m) of this section,
after [AFTER] receipt of an application, the director
shall send the absentee ballot and other absentee
voting material to the applicant by the most
expeditious mail service. However, if the application
requests that an absentee ballot for a state election
be sent by electronic transmission, the director shall
send the absentee ballot and other absentee voting
material to the applicant by electronic transmission.
Except as provided in (k) of this section, the
absentee ballot and other absentee voting material
shall be sent as soon as they are ready for
distribution. If the absentee ballot and other
absentee voting material are mailed to the applicant,
the return envelope sent with the ballot and other
materials shall be addressed to the election
supervisor in the district in which the voter is a
resident.
* Sec. 7. AS 15.20.081 is amended by adding a new
subsection to read:
(m) If mail sent by the division to a voter at
an address is returned as undeliverable, the division
may not send the voter an absentee ballot at that
address unless the voter appears in person before a
registration official to verify the address, presents
a current driver's license, state identification card,
or other current and valid photo identification, and
requests that the division send an absentee ballot to
the address.
* Sec. 8. AS 15.20.800(b) is amended to read:
(b) If the director conducts an election under
(a) of this section by mail, the director shall send a
ballot for each election described in (a) of this
section to each person whose name appears on the
official registration list prepared under AS 15.07.125
for that election. The director shall send ballots by
first class, nonforwardable mail. The ballot shall be
sent to the address stated on the official
registration list unless
(1) the voter has notified the director or
an election supervisor of a different address to which
the ballot should be sent; or
(2) the address on the official
registration list has been identified as being an
undeliverable address and the voter has not verified
the address as provided in AS 15.20.081(m)."
Renumber the following bill section accordingly.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER objected for the purpose of discussion.
3:52:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN stated that Amendment 5 required the
division to verify a voter's identity prior to mailing a ballot
to an address from which mail had been returned.
3:53:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD considered a scenario in which voter mail
was returned as undeliverable. Under current practices, she
asked whether the division would continue to send an absentee
ballot to that same address.
MS. BEECHER deferred to Ms. Thompson.
3:54:34 PM
MICHAELA THOMPSON, Acting Director, Division of Elections (DOE),
Office of the Lieutenant Governor, explained that a preferred
mailing address must be indicated on the absentee ballot
applications. If the ballot was returned as undeliverable, the
ballot would not be re-sent until the voter was contacted by the
division and the mailing address was confirmed or updated.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD said she was under the impression that
ballots could not be forwarded.
MS. THOMPSON explained that if the division mailed a ballot to a
person who had set up a forwarding service on his/her address,
the United States Postal Service (USPS) would return that ballot
to the division. The division would then contact the voter to
confirm or update his/her mailing address and resend the ballot.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD asked whether Section 7 of Amendment 5
outlined existing practices.
MS. THOMPSON shared her belief that the amendment required
voters to appear in person before a registration official to
verify the address, which was not existing practice.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD opined that voting by absentee ballot was
the safest way to vote aside from in person.
3:57:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY expressed concern about requiring voters in
rural Alaska to appear in person before a registration official.
He asked whether there were election officials in every
community in Alaska.
MS. THOMPSON replied not in every community.
CHAIR VANCE expressed her opposition to Amendment 5 because it
would expand the scope of the bill.
3:58:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN shared a personal anecdote. He
emphasized that Amendment 5 was asking DOE not to send ballots
to undeliverable addresses, similar to a print shop. He argued
that if this was in fact existing practice for the division, DOE
should be encouraged to continue doing so. He said there should
be no allowances for continuing to mail ballots to
[undeliverable] addresses.
[The committee considered the objection to Amendment 5 to be
maintained.]
4:00:08 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Allard and Eastman
voted in favor of Amendment 5. Representatives Groh, Carpenter,
C. Johnson, Gray, and Vance voted against it. Therefore,
Amendment 5 failed by a vote of 2-5.
4:00:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER moved to adopt Amendment 6 to CSHB
129(STA), labeled 33-LS0668\B.9, Klein, 5/6/23, which read:
Page 3, line 18, through page 4, line 1:
Delete all material and insert:
"(g) The division shall adopt regulations
providing for regular review and updates of the master
register. The regulations must provide for review of
the register for data breaches, the number of
registered voters compared to persons eligible to vote
in the state, and the names of deceased voters,
persons convicted of a felony involving moral
turpitude, persons not qualified to vote under
AS 15.05, and persons registered to vote in another
state. The regulations must specify records and
databases for use in reviewing the master register;
the records and databases must include databases
sourced from governmental agencies outside the
division, including the United States Postal Service
national change of address database, the database of
permanent fund dividend recipients, Alaska Court
System databases, state motor vehicle records, records
of the state programs of corrections, property and
sales tax records, records of the federal social
security system, municipal assessor databases, the
United States Social Security Administration death
index, an alien database maintained by the United
States Department of Homeland Security, and jury duty
records from other jurisdictions. The director shall
compare the master register to state welfare and
public assistance agency databases to identify
information relevant to registration to vote in state
elections, including address changes, deaths, and
citizenship status, and shall review the number of
voters registered at each registration address to
identify anomalous registration totals."
Page 4, following line 15:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 6. AS 15.07.195 is amended by adding a new
subsection to read:
(e) Unless disclosure of information related to
a data breach of information made confidential by this
section would compromise a criminal investigation, the
director shall, not less than 30 days after
discovering the breach, publish notice of the nature
and severity of the breach on the division's Internet
website and report the details of the breach to the
president of the senate and the speaker of the house
of representatives."
Renumber the following bill section accordingly.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected for the purpose of discussion.
4:00:54 PM
JAKE ALMEIDA, Staff, Representative Sarah Vance, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of the House Judiciary Standing
Committee, sponsor by request, chaired by Representative Vance,
explained that Amendment 6 revised subsection (g) on page 3,
line 18 through page 4, line 1 of the bill. He read the new
language, indicating that the proposed amendment dealt with the
information used by the division to verify the master register.
4:02:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY directed attention to page 1, lines 17-19 of
Amendment 6, and asked whether the division currently compared
the master register to state welfare and public assistance
agency databases.
MS. BEECHER answered no.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY pointed out that state welfare and public
assistance agencies were generally used by "poor people;"
consequently, he shared his belief that by referencing those
databases, the language singled out [low-income] individuals.
CHAIR VANCE clarified that the intent was to utilize various
databases within the state to verify updated information.
4:04:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH asked whether the language would impose an
additional fiscal note.
MS. BEECHER answered yes, as it would require interface between
the current system and the state welfare and public assistance
agency databases.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked why fishing and hunting license
databases weren't included.
CHAIR VANCE defined [state welfare and public assistance agency
databases] as "robust" because one-third of Alaskans were on
some type of assistance. She suggested that the inclusion of
those lists would help the division stay up to date, as [public
assistance] forms were renewed every six months.
4:06:34 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
4:07:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER moved to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1
to Amendment 6 to delete the word "shall" on line 17 and replace
it with "may."
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD objected. She opined that "shall" was
favorable to "may" and questioned the purpose of Amendment 6
without the more prescriptive language.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asserted that the division had trouble
differentiating between "may" and "shall" in the past. He
shared an example of the division failing to prioritize a
special election after an elected official passed away [in
2022]. He expressed his hope that the division, under new
leadership, would "come to grips with the idea that these are
reasonable things that they should already be doing, and they
should not be coming to us after we need a special election
and saying ? 'we need more time, we need more money.'"
4:10:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD pointed out that at the time, DOE was in
unchartered waters with rank choice voting (RCV) and a jungle
primary. She asked Ms. Beecher to elaborate on the fiscal
impact of Amendment 6 and asked whether it would require new
people or more efficiency.
MS. BEECHER said the additional fiscal note would require
programming to interface with the public assistance databases,
as well as ongoing maintenance. She compared the potential
costs to that of the permanent fund dividend (PFD) automatic
voter registration (AVR), which cost $250,000 to implement, in
addition to ongoing costs.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD expressed her shock that [using various
governmental databases] wasn't current practice for DOE.
CHAIR VANCE highlighted the $7 million in the capital budget for
voter maintenance and asked whether that money could be utilized
for these types of updates.
MS. BEECHER clarified that the $7 million was earmarked for a
new voter registration system. If the capital funding passed,
she said the division could consider using new technology to
interface [with other databases] and perform batch processes in
a more efficient manner when putting together the bid for the
contract.
CHAIR VANCE sought to confirm that costs of interfacing with
state welfare and public assistance agency databases could be
covered by capital funding, rather than creating a new fiscal
note for the bill.
MS. BEECHER offered to follow up with more specific details.
She suspected that fulfilling these requests would need to be a
separate project from the new voter registration system, which
would take two years to implement, if the legislature wanted
them completed sooner.
4:15:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD asked why [the new voter registration
system] would take two years to implement.
MS. BEECHER highlighted constraints of the request for proposal
(RFP) and procurement processes. Once procurement was complete,
the technical staff was responsible for building the actual
system, which she defined as a long process that could not be
undertaken during an election year.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD asked why the process couldn't be started
in 2025 after the [presidential] election.
MS. BEECHER said it was possible; however, the division's
estimates were conservative so as to avoid overpromising and
underdelivering.
4:18:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY questioned the intent of replacing "shall"
with "may."
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER said the effect of using "may" would
allow the division to follow the provision at their discretion.
[The committee considered the objection to the conceptual
amendment to be maintained.]
4:19:31 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Gray, Groh,
Carpenter, C. Johnson, Eastman, and Vance voted in favor of
Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 6. Representative Allard
voted against it. Therefore, Conceptual Amendment 1 to
Amendment 6 passed by a vote of 6-1.
4:20:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY noted that his prior opposition to Amendment
6 was alleviated by the conceptual amendment.
[The committee considered the objection to be maintained.]
4:21:20 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Eastman, Gray,
Groh, Allard, Carpenter, C. Johnson, and Vance voted in favor of
Amendment 6, as amended. No representatives voted against it.
Therefore, Amendment 6, as amended, passed by a vote of 6-0.
CHAIR VANCE announced that CSHB 129(STA), as amended, would be
held over.
4:22:19 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 4:22 p.m. to 4:29 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 129 - Amendment #1 (B.7) by Chair Vance.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #2 (B.8) by Chair Vance.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #3 (B.4) by Rep. Eastman.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #4 (B.5) by Rep. Eastman.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #5 (B.3) by Rep. Eastman.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #6 (B.9).pdf |
HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |